- Edited
ebai101 However, I don't imagine that it's in the Bela dev's best interest to devote a lot of time to supporting a relatively small high-end community,
yeah, I totally agree.... I think 'hooks' and a recognition is all we could wish for.
(e.g. the fact the make field on the IDE is only 20 chars wide... thats not even enough for an include path )
BUT... I do agree, perhaps the IDE is not really the right tool for my purpose...
cross-compiling - yeah, this is something Ive been seriously considered a few time, and recently was thinking about it again - i don't need an ide, but it would I could use my favourite code editor.
I also like the idea of not having bela running 'extra code' (ide)
of course bela is open source, so I could be tackling these issues myself and contributing back, but unfortunately it seems whenever I bring out bela... its due to wanting to get something done, so I never invest the time I really should do to make it better (for me and others)
hmm... will see if I can invest some time in this....
very tempted with the cross-compiler route (I'm reasonably familiar with this due to axoloti),
if i do it, I could document the process for others.
one thing id like to also consider is if/how the new UI (and old 'scope') aspects could be used in this environment...
perhaps node could run on the local machine?
anyway, thanks @ebai101 , nice to hear others thoughts and ideas on this topic.